https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 Effectiveness of weight-loss interventions for reducing pain and disability in people with common musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review with meta-analysis https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:41190 Thu 28 Jul 2022 11:12:19 AEST ]]> Causal mechanisms of a healthy lifestyle intervention for patients with musculoskeletal pain who are overweight or obese https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:35785 Thu 21 Nov 2019 17:01:58 AEDT ]]> Economic evaluation of a healthy lifestyle intervention for chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:37478 Thu 04 Mar 2021 12:42:13 AEDT ]]> Mechanism evaluation of a lifestyle intervention for patients with musculoskeletal pain who are overweight or obese: protocol for a causal mediation analysis https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:36137 Fri 14 Feb 2020 14:48:05 AEDT ]]> Economic evaluation of telephone-based weight loss support for patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomised controlled trial https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:35237 Fri 03 Dec 2021 10:34:43 AEDT ]]> Effectiveness of a healthy lifestyle intervention for chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:35772 3 months in duration) and body mass index ≥27 kg/m² and <40 kg/m² were randomly allocated, using a central concealed random allocation process, to receive advice and education and referral to a 6-month telephone-based healthy lifestyle coaching service, or usual care. The primary outcome was pain intensity measured using an 11-point numerical rating scale, at baseline, 2 weeks, and monthly for 6 months. Data analysis was by intention-to-treat according to a prepublished analysis plan. Between May 13, 2015, and October 27, 2015, 160 patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention or usual care. We found no difference between groups for pain intensity over 6 months (area under the curve, mean difference = 6.5, 95% confidence interval -8.0 to 21.0; P = 0.38) or any secondary outcome. In the intervention group, 41% (n = 32) of participants reported an adverse event compared with 56% (n = 45) in the control group. Our findings show that providing education and advice and telephone-based healthy lifestyle coaching did not benefit patients with low back pain who were overweight or obese, compared with usual care. The intervention did not influence the targeted healthy lifestyle behaviours proposed to improve pain in this patient group.]]> Fri 03 Dec 2021 10:32:11 AEDT ]]>